Accounting Auditing Accountability Journal †Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Accounting Auditing Accountability Journal? Answer: Introducation The Auditing and Assurance Board (AUASB) is an independent, statutory agency of the Australian Government, that monitors develops, issues and maintains auditing and assurance standards. AUASB standards are enforced by the law for audit or reviews from financial reports required under the corporations act 2001.AUASB has a plan that adopts a number changes to the Australian Auditing Standards resulting from the ISAAB project. Of these ISAAB projects, changes to the way auditors report are the most significant, mostly with the introduction of a new standard ASA701 (Christopher, Sarens, and Leung, 2009). The auditing standards makes use of the an auditors responsibility to communicate Key Audit Matters (KAMs) as reported in the auditors report and also involves an address of the auditors decision as to what to communicate in the auditors report and the composition of such communications. Communicating Kams In Auditors Report The main aim of auditors is to investigate the KAMs and having drawn a professional judgment on financial statements reported. This is communicated through describing what in the auditors report (Cosserat, and Rodda, 2009). New auditing standards ISA701 regulates auditors ability to determine and speak out the KAMs in the auditors report and applies to audits of full sets of general purpose of financial statement (Ifac.org, 2017). It also applies when it is a requirement by the law that the Auditor must communicate the KAMs for other organizations or communicates on personal will. The reason to communicate KAMs is to encourage the value of communication of the auditors report that helps to provide greater accountability of the audit that was done. The major characteristics of the new standards are: Enables auditors of separate organization to make decisions on if to include KAM in their audit report. Rules communication of the KAMs in auditors report of the entities listed. The documentation of the audit relating to the KAM The process through which the auditor determines the KAM by considering areas of high assessed risk. Communication of KAMs also provides more information to stakeholders of financial report to help them understand the matters that were most significance in the auditors decision. Communicating KAMs also helps the appropriate users to understand the most of the significance issues area of judgment in the results of the financial report audit. Communicating KAMs in the auditors report also assists the stakeholders to further engage with the advisory committee. When determining KAMs the significant judgments relating to the areas in the financial report that involved important management decision. KAMs are not supposed to be described where the law or regulation includes public disclosure about the issue or in rare circumstances, the auditor determines that the issue should not be communicated in the auditors report because there are adverse effects of doing so which would outweigh the public interests benefits. The ASA701 applies to audits of general purpose reports of the listed entities when the auditor decides to communicate key audit matters in the auditors report. Key Audit Matters (Kims) KAMs refer to issues that are most significance to an auditors professional decision when auditing an entity financial statement. KAM is selected with those issues that are charged with governance. KAMs are determined by an auditors perspective. through the auditors eyes (Arens et al., 2010).The judgment based decision-making framework in the new ASA 701 is designed for the auditor to select a small amount of issues from what to communication. KAM may be determined in the following ways: Professional decision of the auditor is applied in determining which issues to include in the audit report. The issues are drawn from the audit committee discussion and those matters communicated through the audit findings. The important auditors attention shows that an audit is risk-based. Issues that cause challenge to the auditor in obtaining enough evidence. Auditors report snapshot 28 March 2017 This provides insights and observations on Key Audit Matters. This shows the KAMs topics that were communicated: Goodwill and intangibles: the most common KAM relates to the carrying value assessment or impairment of goodwill and intangibles. Acquisition: over half of the acquisition KAMs arise in the TMT sector and 54% of all TMT audit reviewed. Revenue:42% of entities in the FS sector reported a KAM on revenue, resulting from the audit efforts applied in assessing the stage of completion. Expectations are that KAM arising from revenue should increase. Taxation: half of the taxation KAMs features in the energy and natural resources sector. Auditors focus in assessing the recognition and recoverability of deferred assets, featuring in 42% of taxation KAMs. Auditing Issues Sorrounding The Collapse Of Abc Learning Centre The ABC learning center aimed at providing additional skill and supervision for little children in the pre-school age, also for the aged and disabled. The concept of the childcare centers picked up in a large way in Australia when the ABC learning centers were started in 1998. ABC centers then became the largest of the daycare centers in Australia since it operated in the as a company and the corporate management gave a hand in its accelerated growth in short period of time. The downfall of the ABC learning centers began long before the management of the company came to realize. There was a described way of for the children to staff ratio and it was not possible to generate huge profits margins like others centers in those days by observing the terms of the rules. There was certainly a degradation of the level of education offered by the ABC learning centers since there was never sufficient staff to attend to the children. Some of the learners were disabled and others had others which required attention of a large group of staff which was not possible (Carey,Knechel, and Tanewski, 2013). Interviewees said that the ABC learning centers have no specialists cleaning staff hence the staffs at these centers are required to perform all the duties such as cleaning as well as care for the learners. The results of this are that the staff has less time to teach and care for the learners. A number of interviewees raised concerns on how the staffs were treated at some of the ABC learning centers. A number said that they used to complete tasks at home while others said that they did not receive their payments for set up time, clean up time or for evening staff meetings In the year 2003-04 the financial statements of ABC learning center provided a negative image. Only 56.7 percent of the incomes earned by the firm were to pay the staff dues. The expansion of ABC learning center into such a big participator in the Australian market had been triggered by the policies of the government. The economic and financial problems arose in the wake of the global financial crisis of 2008 which led to the fall of the company (Snchez-Medina, Blzquez-Santana, and Alonso, 2014). ABC learning centers acquisition led to the recognition of the licenses of operating the daycare centers and large amount of goodwill. In 2006, an unknown complaint came up in concerns with the Australian securities and investment commission about the valuation of the ABCs daycare licenses. One of the major things that have contributed to the fall of the ABC learning center is that of financial allegations. According to a representatives in the ACCC, the fall of the ABC learning center has not been the result of increasing competition but it has been due to financial malpractices such as high debts and more than normal acquisition (Azim, 2013). Also the downfall can be attributed by the discrepancies of the financial information provided by the ABC learning centers. It was known well enough that the ABC learning centers was operating under malpractices in the course of maintaining its accounts. The value of the assets decreased as the question of the malpractice increased. The founders of the ABC learning center, Mr Eddy Groves and Dr. Le Never Groves did not appear in the institution in September, 2008. The new management took over and they aimed at restoring the order in the company. This was by accepting the fact that the firm was operating under the malpractice that have been followed since then. Issues That Contributed To The Amendment Of Auditing Standards From Isa 507 To Isa 701 The AUASB matters in auditing standards ASA 701 which deals commonly with communicating KAM in auditors report about the requirement of the law and regulations provisions. Under section 336 of the laws and regulation of the Australian Government, the AUASB may amend Auditing Standards to handle certain corporation legislation. The Auditing standards contrast from the ASA 701, which have been accorded with the Australian Legislative environment and to keep audit quality where the AUASB has seen the importance of doing so. The Auditing standards provide application and other material involving the communication of KAM in the independent auditors report. The enactment of ASA 701 shows that the AUASB is fully committed to conform with the amendments to auditor reporting developed by the IAASB. Recommendations The Australian Legislative Committee should continue amending the auditing standard frequently to avoid fraud in businesses. This will show the effectiveness and the transparency of the audits made. The auditors should consider giving the correct judgment which is seen to be professional so that businesses and investors may have the overview of the financial statements of the company. Business and other institutions are supposed to keep good records of their important information including licenses and financial statements. This will help in getting the correct judgment from the auditors report. ABC learning center collapsed due to lack of keeping good financial records hence providing wrong information to the auditors which led to exposure of their malpractices. This shows the importance of the audit (Houghton, and Campbell, 2013). The new auditing standards ASA 701 communicating KAMs about the independent auditors report was developed as a result of global financial crises. This should be adopted and brought to the notice of the public in order to maintain the objective and purpose of the Australian Legislative Committee Conclusion In conclusion, the new audit standard ASA 701 communicating key matters in independent auditors report shows how the Australian Legislative Committee is committed to enhancing transparency in auditing. Communicating KAMs helps the investors to have an overview of the companies they are investing in. The new auditing standards ASA 701 regulates the auditors ability to communicate on key audit matters that is contained in the audit report. The Auditing Standards conforms to the international standards ISA 701 and communicates key audit matter in auditor reports which is independent as issued by IAASB and IFAC. The downfall of the ABC learning center was not attributed by competition, but the discrepancies of the financial information provided and the tendency of keeping books of accounts. References Arens, A.A., Arens, A., Best, P., Fiedler, B.A., Shailer, G., Elder, R.J. and Beasley, M., (2010). Auditing, assurance services and ethics in Australia: an integrated approh. Azim, M.I., (2013). Independent Auditors Report: Australian Trends From 1996 to 2010. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 9(3), p.356. Carson, E., Fargher, N. and Zhang, Y., 2016. Trends in auditor reporting in Australia: A synthesis and opportunities for research. Australian Accounting Review, 26(3), pp.226-242. Carey, P., Knechel, W.R. and Tanewski, G., (2013). Costs and Benefits of Mandatory Auditing of For?profit Private and Not?for?profit Companies in Australia. Australian Accounting Review, 23(1), pp.43-53. Christopher, J., Sarens, G. and Leung, P., (2009). A critical analysis of the independence of the internal audit function: evidence from Australia. Accounting, Auditing Accountability Journal, 22(2), pp.200-220. Cosserat, G.W. and Rodda, N., (2009). Modern auditing. Wiley. Houghton, K. and Campbell, T., (2013). Ethics and auditing (p. 354). ANU Press. Ifac.org. (2017). Accounting Standards | Governance | Publications and Resources | IFAC. [online] Available at: https://www.ifac.org/publications-resources [Accessed 18 Sep. 2017]. Snchez-Medina, A.J., Blzquez-Santana, F. and Alonso, J.B (2014). Do Auditors Reflect the True Image of the Company Contrary to the Clients Interests? An Artificial Intelligence Approach. Journal of Business Ethics, pp.1-17. Xu, Y., Carson, E., Fargher, N. and Jiang, L., (2013). Responses by Australian auditors to the global financial crisis. Accounting Finance, 53(1), pp.301-338.